We then moved on to banned languages. I know that I am teaching linguistics, but I can’t help but try to sneak some cultural relatively into the curriculum. I discussed the history of banning languages and gave examples from the other countries; In the past, the U.S. banned American Indian languages in federal and state schools located on reservations and punished students for speaking these languages. Currently there are state and federal laws “English only” which effectively tie the hands of educators and compromise the education of children who weren’t taught English in their homes. In France, the government is trying (unsuccessfully) to keep the French language “pure” by banning American words and other nonsense. I then turned to the students and asked if Turkey had any such history of banning languages (knowing full well that it has a very recent history of banning Kurdish). I was met with blank looks all around. Nope, Turkey has never done such a thing.
Because I have been teaching this group for 12 weeks, I felt emboldened enough to suggest that they might be overlooking some historical facts. More blank looks.
“Kurdish?” I said.
“Oh, Kurdish isn’t a language. They don’t even have a writing system.”
“That is to protect the republic. . . .”
I asked them to put their Turkish cultural values aside for a moment and to become scientists, which is probably enough to have me forcibly removed from the country. Luckily I had a podcast on hand in which a linguist disabuses listeners of some commonly-held beliefs about language. No, the Eskimos don’t have 50 words for snow, all languages are equally complex and descriptive, one dialect is not superior to another, all languages change over time despite language “purists” who believe they shouldn’t, etc.
It is funny, because the students easily came up with examples from Bulgaria and Germany in which Turkish had been banned, but when you ask Turks to objectively look at their own country’s history, there is this huge blind spot. I don’t know if it is because I am an outsider and they just don’t want to talk to me about it or if it is something Turks have not been trained in – cultural relativity. I sense it is the latter.
It reminds me of when I was at the Fulbright/ELF orientation in Ankara. The Turkish government sent representatives to present about the Turkish educational system, the government, and the art and history of Turkey. The experts were all Ph.D.’s, all Turks, well-versed in their fields, politically astute, and used to speaking in public. One Fulbrighter asked the presenter about the Armenian situation. I can’t remember if she used the word genocide or not, but it resulted in a 20-minute tirade that made everyone else in the room squirm. At one point he described how big and powerful Turkey is compared to how small present-day Armenia is; the implication was clear. As for me, I was dumbstruck. I had never seen a public speaker become so enraged. At any moment, I expected one of his companions to remove him from the stage with a cane or something, but in fact, one other panel speaker actually joined in at the end and reiterated some of his ideas.